Thursday, March 22, 2012

Choosing Che

The other day I was walking home and this young, Hispanic guy passed me on the sidewalk and immediately, I noticed that he was wearing a Che Guevara shirt.  And not just the typical, mass-produced beret-wearing image that most people see in all the trendy “hip” stores in the Village and Williamsburg (not to mention my own home borough of Queens), but this one had the slogan, “Que Viva La Revolución”. 

Que viva la revolución?  Really?

Those of you who know me, know how I feel about this.  As the son of Cuban immigrants, this phrase is almost as offensive as Che himself.  The phrase is supposed to be a rallying cry for those who “fight the man”, or “go against the grain” and other pop-culture sayings, referencing the Cuban revolution as an example of how Che and his ilk overthrew a corrupt government and finally brought justice to the small island country.  And what I find particularly galling is that I actually see a few Hispanics wearing this shirt.          

The (almost) laughable part about this, is that most people who wear Che shirts probably have absolutely no idea who this man really was.  He’s portrayed as a hero, the underdog who came out on top.  Even celebrities here in the U.S. talk about him as if he were some sort of role model.  The musician Carlos Santana is quoted as saying, "Che may be dead for you, but he lives in our hearts ... Che is all about love and compassion."

That’s not even remotely true. 

So who was he? “The Motorcycle Diaries” notwithstanding, he was an anti-democratic demagogue at best - and a murderous thug at worst.  After he and Fidel Castro overthrew Fulgencio Batista's government in 1959, they set themselves up as the country's new (permanent) administration. As a result, Cuba continues to be the prison that it is today. It was Guevara, in fact, who devised the idea for the forced labor camps that people like my father were sentenced to for being "enemies of the state."

What crime labeled them “enemies of the state”?  They wanted to leave the country.  That’s it, plain and simple.  They weren’t planning a counter-revolution or plotting some terrorist act.  They disagreed with the way Fidel and Che were running the country and recognized that their children’s future would be bleak at best if they stayed, so they wanted to leave.  No small task back then.  In those days, if you wanted to leave Cuba, you were sent to these forced labor camps for an indeterminate amount of time. You worked from dawn till dusk in the sugarcane fields. My father did that for two years. Breakfast was a some watered down shit-tasting coffee and lunch and dinner was a serving of cornmeal and soggy rice.  That’s who Che was. 

That wasn’t enough, for “el Che”.  He also who created the "ration system" of food distribution that's still in place today. Basically, a household is allotted a small, set amount of rice (or cooking oil, or sugar) per person for the month. Mind you, there's no guarantee that any of those items will be available, but they can hope. As a result, people take great risks in getting arrested for buying food on the black market because, obviously, the ration isn't enough.  

Let me re-write that, they can get arrested for buying food.  That’s the impact Che had.

And what about the people Guevara had executed when he was commander of La Cabaña prison? Now not everyone there was a saint, but I’m not talking about those guys.  I'm talking about the average working man. The ones who were thrown in there, tortured and executed without ever getting a trial because they disagreed with the government he helped establish.  These were the same people he claimed he was fighting for when he and Castro initiated the revolution. Suddenly they were being told how they should think and live and work, and being punished for not complying. That’s Che’s legacy. 

But the shirt’s popularity is undeniable. The people who wear them, I think, fall into one of two categories: A) Those who don’t know who Che was and don’t know what he did, or B) Those who do know, but choose to wear it anyway.  People in the former category should take better care in deciding what message they want to convey by choosing this particular “brand” of clothing.  Those in the latter should be ashamed of themselves.

In either case, the bottom line is that the shirt isn’t cool, it doesn’t stand for rebellion, and it certainly isn’t a goddamn fashion statement.  Actually, I take that back, it does make a statement.  It tells people who know better just how ignorant the bearer really is.

No comments:

Post a Comment